Similar companies
Income Statement (NONE)
| Q3 '25 | QoQ | |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | 700M | 10.6% |
| Gross Profit | 495M | 13.2% |
| Cost of Revenue | 205M | 4.8% |
| Operating expense | 323M | 18.1% |
| Net Income | 142M | 5.2% |
| EBITDA | 181M | 26.3% |
Balance Sheet (NONE)
| Q3 '25 | QoQ | |
|---|---|---|
| Total Assets | 7.61B | 2.2% |
| Total Liabilities | 1.94B | 7.1% |
| Total Equity | 4.78B | 0.2% |
| Shares Outstanding | 155M | 0% |
Cash Flow (NONE)
| Q3 '25 | QoQ | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash from operations | 259M | 91.4% |
| Cash from investing | 39M | 113.5% |
| Cash from financing | -163M | 141.1% |
EPS
Financial Highlights for Janus Henderson Group in Q3 '25
Janus Henderson Group reported a revenue of 700M, which is a 10.6% change from the previous quarter. An increase in revenue typically indicates growing demand for the company's products or services. This positive change in revenue is a good sign, suggesting that the company's sales are moving in the right direction.
Gross Profit stood at 495M, marking a 13.2% change since the last quarter. Gross profit showcases the efficiency in production and sales processes.
Cost of Revenue was 205M, a 4.8% difference from the previous quarter. A rising cost of revenue may suggest increased production or sales costs, which can impact margins. However, if accompanied by a proportionate rise in revenue, it could indicate scaling operations.
Operating Expenses for this period were 323M, showing a 18.1% change from the last quarter. Operating expenses cover the costs of running daily business operations. A significant increase might indicate inefficiencies or investments in growth, while a decrease could suggest cost-saving measures or potential underinvestment in key areas.
Net Income for the quarter was 142M, showing a -5.2% change from the prior quarter. Net income provides a clear picture of the company's profitability after all expenses. An increase suggests the company is becoming more profitable, while a decrease may raise concerns about the company's financial health, unless there are specific one-time costs or investments.
The company's EBITDA for the quarter was 181M, showing a -26.3% change from the previous period. EBITDA gives insight into the company's operational profitability, excluding non-operating expenses like interest and taxes. A rising EBITDA indicates strong operational performance, while a declining EBITDA may signal operational challenges or increased costs.
Janus Henderson Group faced some challenges this quarter with a decline in one or more of the key metrics: revenue, gross profit, or net income. Higher operating expenses might indicate increased investments or potential inefficiencies. A decline in EBITDA signals potential operational challenges or increased costs.
